Given the bitingly sarcastic negativity that typifies many Pentax
critiques posted here, there is a need to be condescending. The post
implied that the Pentax cameras are inadequate photographic tools. Not
only are the 6 megapixel images very acceptable to the stock house and
pubs for which I work, they are more than adequate for every stock
house that I am aware of and every pub I've ever worked with, which
includes some majors. Yet, the post implied that the Pentax digital
camera are not just inadequate for that particular user but inadequate
photographic tools. That is simply not true and requires clarification.
Paul
On Feb 17, 2006, at 8:16 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 17 Feb 2006 at 6:23, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Gosh, someone better tell the magazines I shoot for and the stock
house
that sels my pics that six megapixels isn't good enough. They have
hundreds of my images that are working just fine for them. How could
that be?
There's no need to be condescending, if 6MP images are good enough for
you and
your stock house/magazine publishers that's great, you've got just the
tool to
do the job but it doesn't mean that it's good enough for everyone.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
