On 17 Feb 2006 at 7:30, Paul Stenquist wrote: > Given the bitingly sarcastic negativity that typifies many Pentax > critiques posted here, there is a need to be condescending. The post > implied that the Pentax cameras are inadequate photographic tools. Not > only are the 6 megapixel images very acceptable to the stock house and > pubs for which I work, they are more than adequate for every stock > house that I am aware of and every pub I've ever worked with, which > includes some majors. Yet, the post implied that the Pentax digital > camera are not just inadequate for that particular user but inadequate > photographic tools. That is simply not true and requires clarification.
So I guess you are saying that 6MP images are good enough for mag publication, probably full spread at a pinch too, I agree. Some of us are a little more demanding than that. Condescending enough? Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
