I concur. I have delivered many 20X30 inch family group prints that the clients are very happy with from my *istD. Remember that I was shooting 67's before that.
I'm not saying that higher res wouldn't be useful, but that 6mp from the *istD is pretty darn good. -- Bruce Friday, February 17, 2006, 3:23:47 AM, you wrote: PS> Gosh, someone better tell the magazines I shoot for and the stock house PS> that sels my pics that six megapixels isn't good enough. They have PS> hundreds of my images that are working just fine for them. How could PS> that be? PS> Paul PS> On Feb 17, 2006, at 4:13 AM, John Forbes wrote: >> On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:53:08 -0000, Jens Bladt >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Jay: >>>> The gear available >>>> right now for say shooting birds in flight or other similar subjects >>>> is >>>> somewhat limited. >>> >>> With a Pentax name on it, it is. >>> Other than that, there's quite a few lenses availble from Tokina, >>> Tamron and >>> Sigma and a few Chinese ones too. >>> This one is quite nice: >>> http://www.treknature.com/gallery/Europe/Switzerland/photo4796.htm >>> >>> But the point of a new body is rather that of reslolution. >>> Pentax simply has got to keep up. For group portraits (and other >>> stuff) 6MP >>> is simply not good enough! >> >> Not good enough for what, precisely? >> >> John >> >> >> >> -- >> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ >>
