Hello Rob, Based on your description, am I to interpret that the issue with bodies has mostly to do with High ISO/Low Noise? Essentially a larger sensor becomes the real solution from the body side of things. That would mean either a full frame sensor or a MF body. So Nikon is no help to you either with problem? Seems that Canon full frame or MF becomes the choice.
As for glass, high speed lenses are the order of the day - which has not been Pentax's direction for some time. For this, Canon becomes the only real option when combined with body requirements. Curious if I am understanding your issues? -- Best regards, Bruce Friday, February 24, 2006, 3:51:52 PM, you wrote: RS> On 24 Feb 2006 at 8:01, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >> I don't see a definition for a "kind of photography" in that quote, >> Kostas. I see a statement relating to a kind of equipment. What kind >> of PHOTOGRAPHS is the equipment intended to make? That's photography. RS> Just butting in here for a minute, my photographic endeavours include quite a RS> lot of mid-high energy concert photography these days, and as a consequence RS> generally I find myself shooting in very low light/poor quality light environs. RS> Static low light or slow moving subjects of course I can tackle with other RS> cameras, the problem is that I like to use the best equipment for the job so RS> that I obtain the best result. Pentax used to provide very adequate solutions RS> however now it seems they are off in another direction. RS> Rob Studdert RS> HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA RS> Tel +61-2-9554-4110 RS> UTC(GMT) +10 Hours RS> [EMAIL PROTECTED] RS> http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ RS> Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
