On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 11:37:07AM +1000, Rob Studdert wrote: > On 27 Feb 2006 at 19:20, John Francis wrote: > > > Is a 1.35x crop factor really that much better than a 1.5x? > > Yes because it provides for 10.7MPx capture with essentially the same > physical > pixel dimensions at the *ist D series cameras . . .
Where do you get those figures? By my calculations, a 1.35x crop factor sensor with the same pixel dimensions as the *ist-D only produces 7.5MP.
