From: John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 09:53:02AM -0700, Tom C wrote:
>
> Some of us have compained that Pentax did not have an upgrade offering to > the *istD. That was met with claims that the *ist D does everything they > want, 6.1MP gave images with all the quality they wanted, why would we want
> something more?
>
> Now that a successor has been announced, many of those same people have
> already got in line to purchase one when it's released.

I think that's rather overstating the case.  I'm sure you'd put both
myself and Paul Stenquist firmly in the camp of *ist D supporters;
we've both said that it's a camera capable of delivering the results,
and that some of the most loudly-bemoaned shortcomings (you know the
ones I mean, I'm sure :-) just aren't that important to the way we work.


Just like 'loudly-bemoaned' is overstating the case? I like the *ist D too.

But we've both made it perfectly clear that if Pentax came out with a
camera with a somewhat higher pixel count, and decent improvements in
frame rate and burst length, we'd definitely consider buying one, as
long as it was otherwise at least as good as the D.
For some people, the DS (and, especially, the DS2) is a cheaper way to
get that faster write performance.  For me (I can't speak for Paul)
that is outweighed by the absence of a grip accessory, and the change
in control style (I shoot in HyperProgram mode over 90% of the time).

HyperProgram is my favorite mode as well.

The CF vs. SD card counted against the DS, too, but it looks as if
I'm just going to have to bite the bullet on that one :-(


Overall it's less of an issue as memory prices come down. I'd be unhappy not to be able to use my 4GB microdrives though.

We haven't yet seen detailed enough specifications of the new camera
to know what the frame rate and burst size will be, but I'm sure they
will be better than the D (even with the larger RAW file size). We're
also led to believe it will have other features, such as SR, which I
for one find tempting. Are they necessary? No. Desirable? Definitely.

I'm sure it will be a nice camera.

I guess in the end, I am reacting to the categorization of a negative opinion as whining. Just because it's an opinion that's at odds with anothers does not make it a whine... nor does expressing concern regarding Pentax itself deserve to be categorized as saying the "sky is falling".

Tom C.


Reply via email to