I wonder whether the people who consider the rangefinder more "natural"
started on rangefinders before moving to SLRs?
I started on rangefinders during the Ice Age, but definitely consider the
SLR to be more "natural".
Kenneth Waller
----- Original Message -----
From: "E.R.N. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OT: Photographic enablement but not Pentax.
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Not to be argumentative -
They definitely have a different feel to an SLR,
Agreed
you can see outside the taking frame,
but it's what in the frame that I'm interested in
there is no blanking of the finder as the shot is
made
I don't see how this is a concern, once you've pushed the release, you've
decided that's what you want
the finder view has an air of familiarity as it always remains the
same magnification regardless of the FL of the lens.
but again, its what's in the frame that I'm interested in
I can see a rangefinders being more natural photographic equipment in
that they are closer to the "original/first" camera
YMMV
I wonder whether the people who consider the rangefinder more "natural"
started on rangefinders before moving to SLRs?