Colin J wrote:
Photography is a craft. Digital imaging is a
science. Working at a craft is infinitely more
satisfying, and I think it's a lot more fun.
Working at science is just a chore.
Bullshit and crap!
If film scratches your itch, fine! If it's digital, fine! Both, fine!
These are personal judgements and you entitled to hold them and
state them
But universal judgements of this nature are just PLAIN STUPID and
this is obviously true that I can't hardly be bothered to justify it.
Working digitally is a science BUT mixing chemicals in a darkroom
isn't? What could actually be MORE scientific than varying
exposure times, mixtures, etc. in a darkroom to achieve a desired
result?
Please, if you want to rehash the film/digital argument at least
come up with some more original and convincing.
Keith McG
