True, Bruce. From my own (hard earned) experience that's right Regards Jens Jens Bladt http://www.jensbladt.dk
-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 28. marts 2006 05:21 Til: William Robb Emne: Re: Bailing out. For me, I wouldn't ever give out the images unless they were in a presentable state. The client has no clue about post processing - their opinion will drop and subsequently their recommendation for your services. You either give out printable ones or don't - what this guy did was a big mistake in my book. -- Bruce Monday, March 27, 2006, 6:50:47 PM, you wrote: WR> ----- Original Message ----- WR> From: "Mark Roberts" WR> Subject: Re: Bailing out. >> >> Sorry. Typo. I meant "that's why he doesn't give out *corrected* >> files". I wouldn't expect him to give out corrected digital files any >> more than I would expect him to give out the negatives. >> WR> I dunno. If I am giving out negatives, they are readily printable at any WR> photolab or I haven't done my job in the first place. WR> Why shold digital be held to a lower standard? WR> It's supposed to be better. WR> William Robb -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.2/293 - Release Date: 03/26/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.2/293 - Release Date: 03/26/2006
