Thanks for the comment Bruce.
It was a bit under exposed but i brought it up in Raw. I tried channel
mixer and a few others, but the whites just looked to blown out even
for IR.:-)
I remember reading about Calculations in Scotts book, and thought id
see what it produced.
It is tricky, for me, but others seem to have a handle on it. Wonder if they
will share.<g>
Dave
Quoting Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello David,
There doesn't seem to be as much separation between the trees and sky
as I would like. Gives it a odd feel for me. One of these days, I'm
going to have to take a stab at this IR stuff - seems to be very
tricky to work with.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, April 3, 2006, 5:55:05 PM, you wrote:
DJB> http://web.mac.com/barnyardcam/iWeb/Site/Photos.html
DJB> It looks pretty rough, almost film like.
DJB> Comments.??
DJB> istD 16-45 at 1/60 F4 and i thinnk iso 1600
DJB> Dave
DJB> Equine Photography in York Region
Equine Photography in York Region
