Tim,
I actually agree with the idea of cropping some from the top, AWS
squaring up the scene. I'm just too easy. 8-/

Jack


--- Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Jack should be Don. Sorry Don
> 
> Tim
> Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
>  
> Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds 
> (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 10. april 2006 17:13
> > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> > Subject: RE: This beach is not big enough for both of us
> > 
> > Based on your and Jack's input I did another crop. I played safe
> and used
> > the rules of third. If you are interested, it is at a thumb below
> the
> > picture. The remaining problem is that the second bird doesn't
> stand out
> > of
> > the ground. Not much to do about that I guess.
> > 
> > BTW. My trigger finger is ok. Today I'll give it some real exercise
> and
> > bring along my image tank ;-)
> > 
> > Tim
> > Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
> > 
> > Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
> > (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: 10. april 2006 16:41
> > > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> > > Subject: Re: This beach is not big enough for both of us
> > >
> > > Tim, it doesn't look over sharpened to me.
> > >
> > > Compositionally, the location of the lower bird causes the bird
> to get
> > > lost
> > > in the ground clutter.
> > > The upper bird is a good capture especially back lit as it is.
> But I'd
> > > loose
> > > some of the background water above the bird.
> > > The cocked shore line is a minor distraction to me.
> > >
> > > 2GB huh, you must have a tired finger!
> > >
> > > Kenneth Waller
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Tim Øsleby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Subject: PESO: This beach is not big enough for both of us
> > >
> > >
> > > > Now, I've made the gapahuk (the camouflage). Spent two hours
> there
> > > > yesterday. Great fun. Filled two 1Gb cards.
> > > >
> > > > Here is one of the things I experienced
> > > > http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildegalleri/vis_bilde.cgi?id=229864
> > > >
> > > > This is over sharpened IMO. It needs some more tweaking I think
> it is
> > a
> > > > keeper. Post processing was hard, contrasty. It was hard to get
> the
> > > > details
> > > > out of the shadows. This is the best I can do for now. I still
> got a
> > lot
> > > > to
> > > > learn. But now I find raw processing fun. I believe that's a
> good sign
> > > ;-)
> > > >
> > > > What I like about this picture is the sun shining through the
> > feathers,
> > > > and
> > > > off course, the action.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Tim
> > > > Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
> > > >
> > > > Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
> > > > (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to