Doug Brewer wrote: >Both these lenses will perform very well for you. They have earned >permanent (or as close to permanent as can be) places in my camera bag. >I've been singing the praises of the 35/2 since it came out, and since I >added the 20-35/4, I have not been disappointed. It has done what I have >asked of it, which is, basically, to be wider than 35mm. heh. > >If I were in your shoes, I'd have to go with the 35/2. It is, as Bill >said, a superb lens, and, well, when in doubt, go fast.
When in doubt, go prime and go fast.
