> Some custom labs will now work with RAW. For the photographer, other than time, what advantage would that offer? You'd be giving away the control inherent in the process. Sort of like dropping of a roll of print film & seeing what they do to your print.
Kenneth Waller ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Cartoon effect > Some custom labs will now work with RAW. It's only a matter of time before > many more do so. It obviously allows them to offer a better grade of > processing. But it will probably remain a premium service. I doubt that > the average mini lab will go there. > Paul > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Paul Stenquist wrote: >> >> > With digital, there's no such thing as "standard" settings. If you >> > jpegs, the camera processes the recorded data. If you shoot RAW, you >> > process it. In either case, you have to control the outcome either by >> > setting the camera derfaults to get the right amount of saturation, >> > contrast and exposure or by making the adjustments in your RAW >> > converter. The latter method, of course, gives you more control. >> >> Is RAW accepted at Photo labs, or is it a given that we are all >> photo-finishers anymore? >> >> Kostas >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
