Cotty wrote: > > On 3/7/06, Ann Sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >The only reason they would 't use it, I think, is > >free-lancer politics. > > Doubtful. If a (newsworthy) picture meets the criteria of the picture > editor, then it will be used no matter what the source. I can't believe > that a local paper would run a line or two about a burst hydrant, unless > (say) the car driver was racing away from a murder scene or whatever. Or > unless a bunch of street kids were splashing about in it during a heatwave. > > Define 'newsworthy' ;-) > > -- > > Cheers, > Cotty > > I've been to the town where Shel lives... dog bites man is news :)
Was thinking more that if there are two photos submitted (of anything) and one is from their regular source and one is from a stranger, amateur, etc - given the one by the latter isn't overwhelmingly brilliant. they will say thanks, good job, and publish the one from the regular guy. That was all I was saying... ann -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
