On Jul 5, 2006, at 10:39 AM, Toralf Lund wrote: > Even more differently put, isn't what people are saying here just a > rather convoluted version of "you get less noise with a lower ISO > setting"?
The majority of my work is limited to jpegs because it's volume/speed oriented. But in my tests, running at 1600 ISO and overexposing 2/3 of a stop (and compensating for the shadows with the in-camera contrast control) yielded a better result than a "correctly exposed" 800 ISO image with contrast adjusted in camera to give a matching image. I can't tell you why or how, just that it worked that way. -Aaron -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
