For manual focus use, the MZ-S viewfinder works better for me, as do the
ergonomics. However, I do like the thumb wheel to change aperture rather
than having to use the aperture ring. So I would give the MZ-S a slight nod
ahead of the PZ-1p.
Bruce Dayton
Sacramento, CA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 8:06 AM
Subject: Re: MS-Z vs PZ-1p experience
> From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > There were many times when I used AF and many times when I focused
> manually.
> > I was suprised how much better the MZ-S was at locking on. As the
> lighting
> > got dimmer, this became more noticeable. Pentax has indeed, improved
the
> AF
> > capabilities. Score another for the MZ-S. I can also state that the
> > viewfinder brightness and usability was noticeable and better on the
MZ-S.
> > It was easier for me to work with in the marginal light. Score another
> for
> > the MZ-S.
>
> Hey Bruce,
>
> Thanks for the write-up. Can you comment on which camera you'd rather use
in
> manual focus?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
