On Aug 15, 2006, at 2:27 PM, Mark Stringer wrote:

> A new super-sensor would be great but it does not seem to fulfill the 
> seer's
> vision of  "Mid-September ...forehead-slapping amongst the competition 
> in
> the DSLR world." nor does it fit with "...not a single DSLR out there
> at any price, including ones using the same sensor, have it."  This 
> implies
> it is an in-production sensor and the "improvement" could have already 
> been
> done by someone.

Yes.

> Maybe the innovation is in-camera processing to emulate kodachrome or 
> tri-x
> and possibly eliminate some post processing.  My biggest problem with
> digital is post processing on a monitor, making a print that doesn't 
> look
> like the monitor and all the education it takes to calibrate and 
> coordinate
> equipment to produce the original vision.

No.

> I have quite a few framed prints from MF film.  I have nothing on the 
> wall
> from digital and I've had a D almost since it went on sale.  I produce 
> very
> fine snapshots using my many lens, happy as any amateur shooter could 
> be,
> but  I have not seen the digital image yet that I can get lost in like 
> MF
> and LF images.

I agree.  I have made large prints from the DS2 that I am happy with, 
but they ain't the same as my big prints from 6x7.

-Aaron

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to