You seem so sure! Why is that? -Aaron
-----Original Message----- From: graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subj: Re: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body Date: Wed Aug 16, 2006 1:15 pm Size: 1K To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> Well, as I see it the only real advantage of 6x7 is print quality. Now I do not think there is anyway a 10mp camera is going to match that (except for stitching images together which requires a lot of time and effort), although there are lots of folks who can not tell the difference anyway. -- graywolf http://www.graywolfphoto.com http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof" ----------------------------------- Aaron Reynolds wrote: > Why would either of these prompt me to sell my 67? > > I don't care about any technical tomfoolery -- so what is it that I do care > about? > > Also, when there are lovely modern superwides out there, what does the sensor > size matter? > > -Aaron > > -----Original Message----- > > From: David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subj: Re: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body > Date: Wed Aug 16, 2006 6:59 am > Size: 518 bytes > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > > - The sensor is larger than APS-C? > > - The sensor can be changed buy the user? > > Those are my best guess's. > > Dave > > At 06:46 PM 16/08/2006, you wrote: > >> On Aug 16, 2006, at 3:55 AM, Cotty wrote: >> >>> My guess is that the mount will be fully backwards compatible - eg no >>> green button kludge. >> Why would I sell my 67 for that? >> >> Honestly, people -- WHAT ARE THE ADVANTAGES OF A 6x7?? There really >> are not that many. > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
