I sent in a reply to. Dave
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > But Tom, your posts about Pentax are scurrilous lies:-)) > Paul > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Actually I perceive his post to be fairly accurate, based on the occcasions >> I've said anything negative regarding the Pentax product or company. >> >> >> >> Tom C. >> >> "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or >> numbered." >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >> >To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> >> >Subject: Re: photo dot net thread mentioning the pdml >> >Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:15:44 -0600 >> > >> > >> >----- Original Message ----- >> >From: "Scott Loveless" >> >Subject: photo dot net thread mentioning the pdml >> > >> > >> > > There's a recent thread over at the photodotnet Pentax forum that >> > > mentions the PDML in a rather, well, unforgiving light. It made me >> > > laugh out loud. Enjoy: >> > > http://photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00Hfdd&tag= >> > >> >I remember Wigwam. >> >I don't see anything in my archived sent items that insulted him, so it >> >wan't me that peed in his ear. >> > >> >William Robb >> > >> > >> > >> >-- >> >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> >PDML@pdml.net >> >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > Equine Photography in York Region -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
