Let's just wait and see what % of all this is correct...
Tom C. >From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >Subject: Re: K10D - "facts" and "speculations" >Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:25:59 -0400 > >If not you'll hear the howling everywhere... > >Cotty wrote: > > > > > > >>>So let me get this right. If USM or it's Pentax-monikered > >>>equivalent is > >>>introduced, anyone that wants to take advantage of it is going to have > >>>to buy new lens(es) ? > >>> > >>> > > > >On 31/8/06, Sylwester Pietrzyk, discombobulated, unleashed: > > > > > >>Exactly. One must have lenses with built-in USM motor for USM to > >>work :-) But I guess new mount would be back compatible, so older > >>lenses would work the way they usually did ;-) > >> > >> > > > >Including body-driven AF lenses? I mean, will a K10D have an AF motor > >inside the body as well? > > > > > > > > >-- >Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler. > > --Albert Einstein > > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
