Bucky wrote:
>
> Isn't that a bit of an overreaction? What can possibly be "very sad" about
> it?
>
Getting into subtle syntactical things here - didn't mean to
sound quite so
intense - but then Paul admitted to not having said
initially _exactly_
what he meant. Since he wrote a long response to my thing
I'll explain
in more detail (one might, I guess, say "justify" <g>) in
the response to
him - and, if we are lucky, this letter will appear in all
of the mail boxes
before the other one .
annsan
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ann Sanfedele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 4:32 PM
> Subject: Re: One Sentence
>
> > > I enjoy using technical tools to make a more perfect version of those
> > > things I see.
>
> > I hope you don't realy mean quite that - very sad, if so.
>
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
