PAUL STENQUIST wrote:
>
> Please don't be hurt. I didn't mean to be harsh, just emphatic.
annsan replies:
Ditto re my comments to you.
Paul sez
> I do
> think the dawn photo is slightly enhanced from what I actually saw. The
> color is more saturated due to a slight underexposure and the use of a
> polarizer. And the perspective is altered by the use of a lens that is
> slightly wider than normal vision. So from a purely visual point of
> view, the photograph surpasses the reality. If one considers all the
> variety of things that might affect one in a given place, it is of
> course more stimulating to witness something in person. And I recall how
> invigorating it was to be on that mountain at dawn.
>It was certainly a
> much more moving experience than one can ever achieve by merely viewing
> a photograph.
ann sez
Yup - that was the main message I was clumsily trying to
make, Paul.
Paul said
We probably are much closer to agreement that one might
> imagine given our exchange of e-mails. Have a very pleasant evening.
> Paul
ann sez
U 2 -
well, where I am its a bit past evening now :)
annsan
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
