Leave it to Pentax. They have more for you than you think - you will like
it!!!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anthony Farr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: New Pentax 645n II
> Nooooooooooooooo!!!!!
>
> Spare us the complications of a rotating back SLR. Like a disconnection
> of the shutter cocking from the film advance requiring either a
> Godawfully complicated mechanical connection OR an independantly
> motorised magazine OR a double action winding procedure. Not to mention
> the size and weight increase required because the mirror box, focussing
> screens and prisms would need to cover 6x6cms, which would then nix any
> compatability between 645n and 645n II.
>
> Interchangeable back - YES, rotating back - hmmmm :(
>
> How about a 35mm magazine? Or a Polaroid magazine?
>
> Regards,
> Anthony Farr
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bob Rapp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > And, further more a "rotating" back. Now that would be unique.
> >
>
>
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
