Although the FA31 Limited is a great performer, it's a little wider than a "normal" for the *ist D format. The FA35/2 AL, at 1/3 the price, is 95% of the same quality and is a near perfect normal. I had the 31, didn't like its bulk, weight, or the stupid fixed lens hood (which doesn't provide enough flare protection for the 16x24mm format) so I sold it. I bought the FA35/2 and find it excellent.
If you prefer a wider normal, the FA28/2.8 AL is another good choice. I've come very close to buying one for a long time, but decided that the FA20-35/4 AL covered the range satisfactorily and the one stop slower speed was not a hindrance. I do wish that Pentax would release a nice, compact, DA28/2 Limited. Godfrey On Sep 14, 2006, at 4:08 AM, Peter Smekal wrote: > Hi folks, > I am thinking about buying a 'normal' prime lens for my istD. One > obvious > choice might be the much praised FA 31/1.8. It's quite expensive > however. I > have the chance to one of those old K 30/2.8-lenses for a good > price, but > ... Is the FA 31 worth saving and waiting for? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
