That wasn't the point... Paul... I think you know that. The fact is that some of you can't stand to hear objectivity expressed.
Tom C. >From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >Subject: Re: popphoto.com k10D >Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 19:24:01 -0400 > >It's simple, Tom. The *ist cameras were very good. This camera >appears to be better. Why is that hard to understand? >On Sep 15, 2006, at 5:30 PM, Tom C wrote: > > > My point is largely this: > > > > I am amazed by the strenuous defense of Pentax (by some) when 6MP > > is all > > they had to offer, juxtaposed by the instant desire to abandon 6MP > > when > > Pentax has better. > > > > I understand the 2nd part, but not the first. > > > > > > Tom C. > > > > > > > >> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > >> Subject: Re: popphoto.com k10D > >> Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 16:25:05 -0400 > >> > >> Dig away. > >> On Sep 15, 2006, at 3:53 PM, Tom C wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Why was I riduculed then? You want me to dig them out? > >>> > >>> > >>> Tom C. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > >>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > >>>> Subject: Re: popphoto.com k10D > >>>> Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 15:44:44 -0400 > >>>> > >>>> That's the biggest crock of BS I've ever seen on the list. We've > >>>> all > >>>> been clamoring for a higher resolution camera for a long time. I > >>>> would say it's unanimous. On the other hand, many of us did > >>>> point out > >>>> that the 6 MP cameras worked very well. There's a difference > >>>> that you > >>>> apparently don't understand. > >>>> Paul > >>>> On Sep 15, 2006, at 12:30 PM, Tom C wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I've got emails saved from 3 months back when a lot of you guys > >>>>> were > >>>>> ridiculing me for wanting more than a 6MP DSLR and saying I > >>>>> thought > >>>>> it was > >>>>> foolish for Pentax to continue making them, and how you were > >>>>> TOTALLY HAPPY > >>>>> and SATISFIED with your 6MP Pentax. Now your all in line to buy a > >>>>> new one! > >>>>> > >>>>> *IF* Pentax Japan actually listens to this list and takes > >>>>> seriously > >>>>> the > >>>>> views expressed here (which I highly doubt), then you actually owe > >>>>> all the > >>>>> 'negative', 'whining', ' Chicken Little's' on this list a 'Thank > >>>>> you' for > >>>>> theor voice, because otherwise you'd convince Pentax to kep on > >>>>> churning out > >>>>> more of the same. > >>>>> > >>>>> Now, that's a hoot. > >>>>> > >>>>> Tom C. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > >>>>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > >>>>>> Subject: Re: popphoto.com k10D > >>>>>> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:05:46 -0400 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Rob, you're a hoot. First you complain that the Pentax offerings > >>>>>> aren't good enough. Now, you're complaining that they're too > >>>>>> good. > >>>>>> HAR! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Sep 14, 2006, at 10:48 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 15/09/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Sheesh, for now take some pleasure and pride in what Pentax is > >>>>>>>> trying to do > >>>>>>>> here, that the camera is ore a leader than anything Pentax has > >>>>>>>> produced in > >>>>>>>> a long time, accept that the company may never really compete > >>>>>>>> with > >>>>>>>> Canon in > >>>>>>>> terms of numbers, enjoy the concept of forwards and backwards > >>>>>>>> lens > >>>>>>>> compatibility, check out the camera when it arrives in your > >>>>>>>> area, and > >>>>>>>> decide if it's worthwhile for you. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> It's the likely excessive demand that they are creating that > >>>>>>> has me > >>>>>>> worried, the price point has got people from all aver the place > >>>>>>> interested. The point is that they can't compete with Canon > >>>>>>> numbers, > >>>>>>> we all know this. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> Rob Studdert > >>>>>>> HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > >>>>>>> Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > >>>>>>> UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > >>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>> http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ > >>>>>>> Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >>>>>>> PDML@pdml.net > >>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >>>>>> PDML@pdml.net > >>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >>>>> PDML@pdml.net > >>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >>>> PDML@pdml.net > >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >>> PDML@pdml.net > >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> > >> > >> -- > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> PDML@pdml.net > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
