Of course we can stand to hear objectivity expressed. We're still waiting to here it from certain quarters:-). And that is the point. The *ist cameras were better than many of us expected to see from Pentax. Many of us think this camera will be better. That' s objective. And it's expressed. Paul Paul On Sep 16, 2006, at 7:46 PM, Tom C wrote:
> That wasn't the point... Paul... I think you know that. > > The fact is that some of you can't stand to hear objectivity > expressed. > > Tom C. > > > > >> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >> Subject: Re: popphoto.com k10D >> Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 19:24:01 -0400 >> >> It's simple, Tom. The *ist cameras were very good. This camera >> appears to be better. Why is that hard to understand? >> On Sep 15, 2006, at 5:30 PM, Tom C wrote: >> >>> My point is largely this: >>> >>> I am amazed by the strenuous defense of Pentax (by some) when 6MP >>> is all >>> they had to offer, juxtaposed by the instant desire to abandon 6MP >>> when >>> Pentax has better. >>> >>> I understand the 2nd part, but not the first. >>> >>> >>> Tom C. >>> >>> >>> >>>> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >>>> Subject: Re: popphoto.com k10D >>>> Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 16:25:05 -0400 >>>> >>>> Dig away. >>>> On Sep 15, 2006, at 3:53 PM, Tom C wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Why was I riduculed then? You want me to dig them out? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Tom C. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >>>>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >>>>>> Subject: Re: popphoto.com k10D >>>>>> Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 15:44:44 -0400 >>>>>> >>>>>> That's the biggest crock of BS I've ever seen on the list. We've >>>>>> all >>>>>> been clamoring for a higher resolution camera for a long time. I >>>>>> would say it's unanimous. On the other hand, many of us did >>>>>> point out >>>>>> that the 6 MP cameras worked very well. There's a difference >>>>>> that you >>>>>> apparently don't understand. >>>>>> Paul >>>>>> On Sep 15, 2006, at 12:30 PM, Tom C wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I've got emails saved from 3 months back when a lot of you guys >>>>>>> were >>>>>>> ridiculing me for wanting more than a 6MP DSLR and saying I >>>>>>> thought >>>>>>> it was >>>>>>> foolish for Pentax to continue making them, and how you were >>>>>>> TOTALLY HAPPY >>>>>>> and SATISFIED with your 6MP Pentax. Now your all in line to >>>>>>> buy a >>>>>>> new one! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *IF* Pentax Japan actually listens to this list and takes >>>>>>> seriously >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> views expressed here (which I highly doubt), then you >>>>>>> actually owe >>>>>>> all the >>>>>>> 'negative', 'whining', ' Chicken Little's' on this list a 'Thank >>>>>>> you' for >>>>>>> theor voice, because otherwise you'd convince Pentax to kep on >>>>>>> churning out >>>>>>> more of the same. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Now, that's a hoot. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tom C. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>>>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >>>>>>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: popphoto.com k10D >>>>>>>> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:05:46 -0400 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rob, you're a hoot. First you complain that the Pentax >>>>>>>> offerings >>>>>>>> aren't good enough. Now, you're complaining that they're too >>>>>>>> good. >>>>>>>> HAR! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sep 14, 2006, at 10:48 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 15/09/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sheesh, for now take some pleasure and pride in what >>>>>>>>>> Pentax is >>>>>>>>>> trying to do >>>>>>>>>> here, that the camera is ore a leader than anything Pentax >>>>>>>>>> has >>>>>>>>>> produced in >>>>>>>>>> a long time, accept that the company may never really compete >>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>> Canon in >>>>>>>>>> terms of numbers, enjoy the concept of forwards and backwards >>>>>>>>>> lens >>>>>>>>>> compatibility, check out the camera when it arrives in your >>>>>>>>>> area, and >>>>>>>>>> decide if it's worthwhile for you. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's the likely excessive demand that they are creating that >>>>>>>>> has me >>>>>>>>> worried, the price point has got people from all aver the >>>>>>>>> place >>>>>>>>> interested. The point is that they can't compete with Canon >>>>>>>>> numbers, >>>>>>>>> we all know this. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Rob Studdert >>>>>>>>> HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA >>>>>>>>> Tel +61-2-9554-4110 >>>>>>>>> UTC(GMT) +10 Hours >>>>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>>>>> http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ >>>>>>>>> Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>>>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
