In a message dated 9/19/2006 11:54:45 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: A Photoshop class should be camera agnostic. From the standpoint of image processing, what camera made a particular image file, RAW or JPEG, is almost completely irrelevant presuming that Photoshop's RAW conversion is applicable. Given the level of the software being used, you're not going to get into RAW processing with Camera Raw at all, which is a darn shame as that is where most of the capabilities of digital cameras are, in RAW format capture. You'll be talking entirely RGB level editing capabilities, and almost entirely 8bit work. There's a lot to be had there, if the instructor is any good.
Godfrey ======== Yeah, I know that is why I was disappointed, not using RAW conversion in CS (which I have) or CS2. I really did want that. He taught art and photography classes in colleges for something like 20 years. Basically retired now, I guess, and teaching classes at the local civic arts (adult ed). They get some pretty decent teachers here. I picked up a few things already, but I plan to go through some books afterwards, like Frasier's. I need sort of hands on to learn better, just reading and doing my own exercises doesn't do it for me. Maybe a book followup will. Hopefully. Marnie aka Doe ;-) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
