Ok, thanks for the tip ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 8:46 PM Subject: Re: What's an LX worth?
> It was the least expensive of all the Pentax 135 K-mount lenses. Some > of the elements aren't multi-coated. The supply of these lenses exceeds > the demand, so they are not worth a lot. Others have reported getting > good results with the lens as well, but it's only forth around $50 US. > I'd start the auction at $30 tops. Or I'd keep the lens. > Paul > On Oct 5, 2006, at 6:35 AM, J and K Messervy wrote: > >> What's wrong with the Takumar bayonet lens? From using it, I reckon >> it's a >> great piece of glass. >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Kostas Kavoussanakis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> >> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 8:10 PM >> Subject: Re: What's an LX worth? >> >> >>> On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Paul Stenquist wrote: >>> >>>> If your 135/2.5 is the SmC Takumar screwmount (either >>>> of the two varieties available), I'd start it at $125. If it's an >>>> earlier screwmount, I'd start it at $60. >>> >>> As it is the Takumar Bayonet, great demand may not be there, I am >>> afraid. The LX however... :-) >>> >>> I suggest that you do a search on eBay for completed listings for >>> these items to get an idea of prices. >>> >>> Good luck! >>> >>> Kostas >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
