OK, so if I understand you, the pics were made in RAW and converted to JPEG within the camera, using the camera firm/software, as opposed to being shot in JPEG or converted to JPEG in editing software like Photoshop. Correct?
Shel > [Original Message] > From: John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > Date: 10/6/2006 9:30:34 AM > Subject: Re: K10 samples > > > The K10D has the capability to produce a JPEG file (in camera) from > a shot originally exposed as a RAW image - kind of like a RAW+JPEG > exposure, but with the JPEG being created at a later time. > > In the (mostly Japanese) text alongside the image the line that > identifies the firmware as V1.00 also includes the characters "RAW" > together with some ideograms - I'd guess this says "in-camera RAW". > > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 07:21:50AM -0700, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > Hi Ken, > > > > I don't understand your comment about "in camera raw processing." These > > pics are JPEG's, and the two that I dl'd last night had no EXIF info (that > > I could find). So where does raw fit into all this? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
