Joseph Tainter wrote: > OK, so if I understand you, the pics were made in RAW and converted to > JPEG within the camera, using the camera firm/software, as opposed to > being shot in JPEG or converted to JPEG in editing software like > Photoshop. Correct? > > Shel > > ----- > > I find this puzzling. Don't all JPEGs originate as RAW data that are > then JPEG-ized in the camera? > > Pentax is advertising that you can do RAW processing in the K10D, like > one would do in a program residing on your computer. I assume this means > just that one has more control over how the camera processes the RAW > into a JPEG. > > Joe >
one has all the controls that you can normally set on the camera, plus basic exposure controls. The advantage is you can change the settings on a per-image basis after the fact (rather than shooting in JPEG where you are stuck with the settings you picked). This isn't as good as a good RAW converter, but far better than shooting RAW+JPEG for getting good proofs. -Adam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
