Another advantage would be if you are like me, I set white balance later. So if I was shooting in incandescent light, a normal jpeg would be wrong. Shooting Raw+jpeg would have me end up with a poor jpeg. Shooting raw alone and then later converting one image to jpeg in camera, hopefully the white balance could be corrected.
-- Best regards, Bruce Friday, October 6, 2006, 10:27:10 AM, you wrote: JF> That would be my interpretation, yes. JF> The result should produce basically the same file as would have been JF> produced by shooting in JPEG (or RAW+JPEG), but of course you've JF> still got a RAW file for use with your favourite image editor. JF> It's handy if you usually shoot RAW, but need a JPEG file fast JF> (for giving to somebody else, or for a quick-and-dirty test print) JF> and you don't have any image editing software handy. And, of JF> course, it presumably lets you defer decisions on white balance, JF> contrast, saturation, etc. JF> On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 09:40:52AM -0700, Shel Belinkoff wrote: >> OK, so if I understand you, the pics were made in RAW and converted to JPEG >> within the camera, using the camera firm/software, as opposed to being shot >> in JPEG or converted to JPEG in editing software like Photoshop. Correct? >> >> Shel >> >> >> >> > [Original Message] >> > From: John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >> > Date: 10/6/2006 9:30:34 AM >> > Subject: Re: K10 samples >> > >> > >> > The K10D has the capability to produce a JPEG file (in camera) from >> > a shot originally exposed as a RAW image - kind of like a RAW+JPEG >> > exposure, but with the JPEG being created at a later time. >> > >> > In the (mostly Japanese) text alongside the image the line that >> > identifies the firmware as V1.00 also includes the characters "RAW" >> > together with some ideograms - I'd guess this says "in-camera RAW". >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 07:21:50AM -0700, Shel Belinkoff wrote: >> > > Hi Ken, >> > > >> > > I don't understand your comment about "in camera raw processing." These >> > > pics are JPEG's, and the two that I dl'd last night had no EXIF info >> (that >> > > I could find). So where does raw fit into all this? >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
