If I gave points to each camera it would be that the PZ-1p does better with
flash synch speed which is most useful for fill-flash. It can also do flash
compensation with any TTL flash.
The MZ-S, however, is less tiring to hold (for me), better autofocus
(including multi-point) and in practice, the Hyper Manual of the PZ-1p is
almost the same. All you do is take the aperture off 'A' and let the meter
set the shutter speed. Then spin the dial with your thumb one notch and
back and it is in manual at the right setting. Just the same as pressing
the IF button. For a new auto exposure just press the auto button and
repeat the process. Just about the same and the net effect is the same. I
agree that the shutter does sound less solid than the PZ-1p, but it also has
less vibration to go with it. I have finally become accustomed to it.
Right now, I think that the biggest single advantage the PZ-1p has is price.
It's a great camera for a great price. The MZ-S is a great camera for a
good price. I'm just waiting for that new flash to get out to get my flash
compensation and wireless triggering.
Bruce Dayton
Sacramento, CA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 6:22 PM
Subject: Re: MZ-S and 3rd party lenses
> From Bruce Dayton:
>
> >Good luck on the debate and decision. I can only offer this: If you like
> manual control and like the basic premise of the >SuperProgram, you will
> really like the MZ-S. If you like the interface of the Canons, you will
> like the PZ-1p better. I think >the PZ-1p has a faster, better interface
> than the Canons, but the style is very similar. Both are very nice
bodies.
>
> Hey Bruce,
>
> It is a tough decision as both have desirable qualities. The MZ-S stands
out
> with its compact size, PC socket, and updated autofocus. The PZ-1p stands
> out with slightly fast flash sync, Hyper Manual mode, and the ability to
> control the aperture from the body. The PZ-1p, however, has the older AF
> system and no PC socket (I have studio strobes). The MZ-S is $350 more and
> (this is a bit nitpicky) the shutter sounds terrible... A really mixed bag
> and for my needs, no clear winner...
>
> Mark
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
