At 11:15 AM 11/10/2006, Adam Maas  wrote:
> > hahahahaha  sorry, I knew all that.  What I thought was weird is that
> > the "field tests"  showed a difference in shake reduction performance
> > between K, M and A lenses when I thought those three types would behave
> > the same.  My poor quoting.
> >
>
>It is odd, and I'm slightly baffled by it.

Possibly a naming rounding error? Perhaps the actual focal length isn't 
what's written on the lens.

Dave


>Think I'm going to pick up an SMC-A 50/2 on friday so I can do some real
>field tests (as opposed to comparing disparate lenses).
>
>Right now, 55mm seems to be working better than 50mm as a setting for my
>SMC-M 50/2.
>
>-Adam


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to