Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > All well and good, and no contradiction to what I said. I wouldn't > choose it for doing architecture, however. Between the rendering > quality and the need to do rectilinear correction with PTLens, I'd > find it a pain. ;-) > > Godfrey >
I agree that there is no contradiction. In fact, all the "wide-to-normal" or "wide-to-small tele" zoom lenses that I know show too much distortion for "serious" architecture photography. That is also the case with the 16-45, judging from the photos I have seen and user reports. But I also think that many zooms lenses are useful for that kind of photography if the photographer understands their limitations and can live with them, or is prepared to correct the shots in post processing. Carlos -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
