Sorry guys but you really cant do serious Architechure with any pentax cameras or Lenses because you need full camera movements That only a view camera can provide for architecture. Its amazing what you can do with a view for that. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carlos Royo Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 1:52 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Pentax DSLR - some questions before I decide Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > All well and good, and no contradiction to what I said. I wouldn't > choose it for doing architecture, however. Between the rendering > quality and the need to do rectilinear correction with PTLens, I'd > find it a pain. ;-) > > Godfrey > I agree that there is no contradiction. In fact, all the "wide-to-normal" or "wide-to-small tele" zoom lenses that I know show too much distortion for "serious" architecture photography. That is also the case with the 16-45, judging from the photos I have seen and user reports. But I also think that many zooms lenses are useful for that kind of photography if the photographer understands their limitations and can live with them, or is prepared to correct the shots in post processing. Carlos -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
