In a message dated 10/13/2006 8:41:26 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thanks, Doug. So the dynamic range is the same for 12 vs. 22 bit conversion, but the 22 bit conversion allows more subtle shading.
I have never been discontented with the shading rendered by my D. Is the 22 bit converter much ado about nothing? Joe ========= I seriously doubt it is much ado about nothing. Sometimes until you see something good, you don't realize what the improvement can be. For instance, my Epson 925 produces good photos, but I have seen photos from Godfrey's R2400, and they are outstanding. Finer dots, but until I saw them I would have had no idea how that could make such a difference. Some of the differences we see are on such a subtle level, we might not be able to pinpoint what they are exactly, but still we can see an improvement -- we can see better quality. Just my opinion. Marnie aka Doe Of course, Godfrey is a much better photographer than I am too, but I mean you can tell the quality of the prints is better. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
