No, he meant "ALL THE TIME" literally
And then went on to tell me a BS
Story why when I specifically asked 
Him WHY WHY WHY he did it **ALL** the time?
He didn't say most or some of, he said ALL
The time.
jco

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Adam Maas
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2006 11:58 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: K1D aperture simulator, part Three (III)- NOT

No, aparently you are unfamiliar with the general usage of the phrase 
'all the time', which means 'on a regular basis'.

-Adam


J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> See , you changed your story. You initially stated
> You shot stopped down ALL THE TIME which was the 
> Very reason I pressed on the matter because it was
> Senseless way to opertate.
> jco
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> Adam Maas
> Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2006 9:54 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: K1D aperture simulator, part Three (III)- NOT
> 
> Except, based on the caveats I gave (Close to wide open, in good
light),
> 
> your arguments are incorrect.
> 
> Your arguments are only correct for small apertures and low light. IN 
> which case, I focus wide open. And I rarely do the former, ant
typically
> 
> use my open-aperture only gear for the latter.
> 
> -Adam
> 
> 
> J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>> It is NOT faster to focus stopped down, the wider DOF and dimmer
image
>> Makes it HARDER not easier to focus accurately. Why
>> Do you think auto aperture cameras and lenses were developed
>> Way back in the 50's? Because its easier and faster way
>> To work. I know because I have been using those cameras
>> For years and years too. Less DOF means easier focus. Period.
>> I am not arguing how he works, I am arguing the REASON
>> He gave. 
>> jco
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of
>> Shel Belinkoff
>> Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2006 12:56 AM
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: RE: K1D aperture simulator, part Three (III)- NOT
>>
>> You're just making a fool of yourself.  What hubris to tell someone
> how
>> they choose to photograph or use their gear is wrong.
>>
>> Let me tell you something ... I don't know how old you are or how
long
>> you've been photographing, but I'm willing to wager you're not as old
> as
>> I
>> and that you've not been photographing as long either.  When I shot
> with
>> Spotties back in the late sixties, I'd often shoot with the lens
> stopped
>> down, and depending on the lens, light, and scene, I'd shoot @ 5.6 or
>> 8.0. 
>> I knew EXACTLY what I was doing.  Shooting that way could be fast and
>> accurate.  With the better finders of today - brighter and more
>> contrasty -
>> it's even easier to shoot in that manner.
>>
>> Anyway,  YOU don't have to see it.  It's what Adam sees that matters.
>>
>> To call someone you don't know stupid and a liar here in a public
> forum
>> shows more about you and your character than you probably want us to
>> know.  
>>
>> Shel
>>
>>
>>
>>> [Original Message]
>>> From: J. C. O'Connell 
>>> See my last post, your reason for doing so is flawed 
>>> And there are other reasons why its worse too.
>>> jco
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> Adam Maas
>>> John, You Ignorant Slut,
>>>
>>> It's quicker and I can see what's in focus at all times. Simple as
>> that.
>>> Just because you don't, doesn't mean I can't.
>>>
>>> -Adam
>>>
>>>
>>> J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>>>> When the thread title is stupid I am going to comment on it.
>>>> Secondly why havent you told us WHY WHY WHY you shoot with
>>>> M42 auto-aperture lenses and bodies stopped down all the time?
>>>> I don't believe it, either your stupid for doing so or your
>>>> A liar for saying so unless you have some good explanation
>>>> For doing so which I simply cant imagine as I am a LONG TIME
>>>> User of M42 bodies and lenses and that makes no sense whatsoever
>>>> To me at this point. I'd love to hear your reason for doing so.
>>>> Maybe there is something I am missing but I cant see it.
>>
>>
> 
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to