On Oct 19, 2006, at 11:13 PM, Adam Maas wrote: > The problem is the the compressed file size is irrelevant to what size > print you can make from it, as it varies by image rather than > solely by > resolution and colour depth. Uncompressed file size is directly > relevant > to what you can do with the file, so it's a far more useful measure > for > anything beyond how many images you can fit on a disk.
My god! A logical argument! What's this doing here? Yes, Adam, I see your point. Bob -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
