I'm trying to change it to a discussion of automakers and quality:-). Paul On Oct 22, 2006, at 3:37 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> I have left this list on three separate occasions in the recent past > because I found the attitude of, and the comments by, J. C. O'Connell > so disturbing. I was afraid that if I continued to read such > material, I would disgrace myself by descending to the same level. > > Can we end this thread and move on? Please? > > Dan M > > On 10/21/06, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> At least I don't contradict myself, that's the worst >> Possible thing to do in a so called discussion >> Or debate. >> jco >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> Behalf Of >> Paul Stenquist >> Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 10:47 PM >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: Re: The JCO survey >> >> You responses are so demeaning and insipid that they brand you as a >> complete asshole for however long you remain a member of this list. >> JCO, your are dead meat as far as most of us are concerned. >> Paul >> On Oct 21, 2006, at 10:16 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote: >> >>> Not so quick you big dummy. He, by his own admission >>> Said he really liked the automation his newer lenses >>> Provide. Well, well, well, if he likes automation, its >>> Pretty stupid to say its of no consequence or important >>> To have the K/M automation features removed. If he >>> Doesn't care about the very things he says he likes alot, that >>> Makes him QUITE illogical by any standards. >>> jco >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >>> Behalf Of >>> Keith McGuinness >>> Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 8:26 PM >>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> Subject: Re: The JCO survey >>> >>> Shel Belinkoff wrote: >>>> It's not an either/or proposition. I can shoot any way I >>>> please, and >>> get >>>> pleasure of varying degrees from whatever my choice is. Of course, >>> you're >>>> so blinded by what you perceive as being the one and only way of >>>> doing >>>> things, you can't understand that. >>> >>> Of course! >>> >>> And I agreed with Shel's original post on how he shoots with the >>> various lenses. >>> >>> His point was, simply, that because of the way he shoots, the >>> loss of the aperture thingy is of little consequence. >>> >>> THAT argument is simple and perfectly logical. >>> >>> Suggesting that the way the he shoots is illogical is beside the >>> point. He can use his camera and lenses any way he likes to get >>> the pictures he wants. If it works for him, then that's the end >>> of that argument. >>> >>> Keith McG >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
