You are putting that in your book, aren't you? On 10/27/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is no such thing as an aperture simulator. it's merely a > reflection of man's inability to accept his shortcomings. Once we > all learn to accept one another, there will be no need for these > illusions of an aperture simulator. > On Oct 27, 2006, at 12:19 AM, Scott Loveless wrote: > > > On 10/26/06, Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If the glass is yellowish at certain angles, is it one of the > >> radioactive ones? > >> > > If your super-tak is a 50/1.4 or a 35/2 then you may have a > > radioactive lens. Otherwise, the yellow you see at certain angles is > > probably due to the way the coating reflects yellow light. > > Interestingly enough, later super-tak 55/2 and 55/1.8 lenses with the > > aperture simulator lug (here we go again) may actually have SMC. I've > > read differing opinions on this, so don't take my word for it. > > > > > > -- > > Scott Loveless > > http://www.twosixteen.com > > Shoot more film! > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >
-- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com Shoot more film! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
