On 10/31/06, Pål Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Others also complimented the performance of the 45 and 35 mm lenses. > > > For what its worth I found the FA645 45/2.8 to be a pretty weak performer. > It is no better than the zooms covering this range (the FA645 45-85/4.5 is > in fact better) and was more prone to flare than any other Pentax lens I've > ever used. > I have never used the 35 or the 55 mm lenses but they are both regarded > among the good ones. I recomment the 45-85 zoom instead of the 45mm. > After spending some time looking over your photos, I have no doubt that a 45-85 in the right hands can yield stunning results. Right now, though, I'm really more interested in using prime lenses. Thanks for the comments, Pal. Much appreciated.
-- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com Shoot more film! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
