I find the in-camera sharpening to be excellent on the K100D, something the *istD was not noted for. RAW sharpness seems about the same.
-Adam Gonz wrote: > Although I think that the antishake has to be part of the equation. For > normal handheld shots, it must add some effective resolution as compared > to a shot with even small amounts of movement. My K100D shots just seem > to be sharper than my *istD shots even though they are both 6Mp. > > rg > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>Agreed. My mistake. >>Paul >>On Dec 1, 2006, at 11:37 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote: >> >> >> >>>but you wont get the full 66 percent increase in >>>resolution unless you had an **infinately** sharp >>>lens. The actual increase is less, and signifigantly >>>less with average or mediocre lenses...This is not >>>taking IS into account of course. IS is a seperate issue >>>unrelated to sensor resolution... >>>jco >>> > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
