Oh, I'd agree, the people who are sufficiently sensitive are quite rare. I just happen to be one of them.
-Adam Paul Stenquist wrote: > I shot more than a hundred people pics last night with P-TTl. The > number of closed eyes I had was consistent with what I've seen shooting > TTL or manual. In other words, two or three percent. > Paul > On Dec 8, 2006, at 1:48 PM, Adam Maas wrote: > > >>Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, William Robb wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>I should probably have moved to a new technology flash with the >>>>istD, I >>>>might have been happier with TTL performance. >>> >>> >>>You would have gone P-TTL then, P meaning a pre-flash. Not sure what >>>it does to dogs' expressions (although it's meant to be pretty >>>instant, people have said on the list that it causes people to blink). >>> >>>Kostas >>> >> >>It's nigh-on impossible to get a good shot of me with a consumer-level >>DSLR that uses preflash, I'm way too sensitive to the preflash and the >>delay between preflash and actual firing is too long. I had a friend >>of mine try repeatedly with a D70 and SB800, he got good shots in Auto >>or manual flash and closed eyes in i-TTL mode. Same goes for Canon. A >>Canon 1D or Nikon D2 has a small enouhg delay between preflash and >>actual firing to catch my eyes before they close. >> >>-Adam >> >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>PDML@pdml.net >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
