Any sufficiently advanced technology will be indistinguishable from magic.
(Paraphrased from Arthur C. Clark)
With the state of Education today, I believe we've entered the age of Magic.
graywolf wrote:
> Of course there is always the question, will the print show the added
> color space or does the printer just down sample it internally? I would
> guess the later, so it would just be a convenience. Basically paper and
> ink will only reflect so much light. To get more you would have to print
> a transparency. It is simple physics. Luckily most photographers believe
> in physics, over on an audio forum I have noticed that they mostly
> believe in magic.
>
>
> Boros Attila wrote:
>
>> Hello Rob,
>>
>> Wednesday, December 13, 2006, 1:03:12 AM, you wrote:
>>
>> DIS> Commercial print services generally require sRGB souce however the
>> DIS> occasional one will provide custom profiles, in most cases sRGB will
>> DIS> be adequte. But often printer profiles for newer colour ink-jet
>> DIS> printers are wider than sRGB or Adobe RGB so choosing either of these
>> DIS> colourspaces as your source or workspace or finally converting to
>> DIS> either during save may reduce the potential quality of your prints.
>>
>> So the best would be to create a color profile of my printer (I don't
>> have a printer yet) with PrintFIX or something similar and convert to
>> that profile just before printing. This way I could be sure that I use
>> the printer at it's best possible quality.
>>
>> --
>> Attila
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
--Albert Einstein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
