It's not an argument at all. I'm simply stating that since I paid, at the time, a pretty penny, and haven't used it that much, I'm disappointed.
Why would I shoot film just to use my flash unit? Tom C. >From: Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >Subject: Re: RE: K10D and Ring flash >Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:49:25 +0000 (GMT) > >On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Tom C wrote: > > > Yeah I understand that technology changes... It doesn't help though that >I > > bought their most expensive flash unit and that now it's basically >useless. > > :-) Long before the life of the product itself has been exhausted. > >That's an aperture-simulator kind of argument. Stick it on an AF film >body and enjoy. > >The real complaint is that we had to wait 14 years for the successor >of the AF500FTZ (more if you live in the UK). The MZ-S would have made >use of it as early as 2001. > >Kostas > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
