Great info Godfrey, thanks for sharing. Curious as to how you judged accuracy exposure wise?
> About 20 of the 25 scenes exposed with the K10D today were right on > the money exposure-wise at 0EV compensation. Kenneth Waller ----- Original Message ----- From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: K10D - exposure consistency, bracketing >I spent a bit of time today working with the auto-bracketing feature > to determine metering consistency for RAW captures. I set the > bracketing to 3 exposures and then set the mid-point to +0.3EV, > netting effectively a 0, +.3 and +.7 bracket set. Walked around and > made about 75 exposures this way, that's 25 scenes. > > Opening them with Bridge/Camera Raw, I found that the K10D's RAW > exposure consistency is much better than the *ist DS. With the *ist > DS I had come to us +0.3EV to +0.7EV as my baseline for good RAW > exposure, greater than 80% of my photos needed that much EV > Compensation... > > About 20 of the 25 scenes exposed with the K10D today were right on > the money exposure-wise at 0EV compensation. The rest required just > +0.3EV exposure, and three of those were due to scene dynamics that > made it obvious why. > > Yet another "I'm very pleased with what I see." moment. ;-) > > Godfrey > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
