On Dec 14, 2006, at 8:59 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:

> On 15/12/06, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The diffraction limits of optical lenses are
>> independent of focal length and absolute aperture.
>> Diffraction limits are inversely proportional to
>> f-ratio (f-stop) and the approx formula is 1500/f-ratio
>> in line pairs /mm. This means at f6.3 lens would have
>> to first resolve ~240 lp/mm to be considered diffraction
>> limited and that would be quite an impressive lens
>> indeed. Most lenses dont reach true diffraction limited
>> resolution performance until f11 or smaller. e.g.
>> they are WORSE than the diffraction limit as f11 or wider.
>> I dont think you are going to find any 14mm lenses
>> for 35mm FF or even APS that are truly reaching diffraction
>> limited performance across entire format ( as good as phyics will  
>> allow
>> ) at
>> an f-stop as wide as F6.3. Aint going to happen on such a wide
>> angle lens, even on APS where its not as wide as 35mm.
>
> Sometimes you make a great deal of sense John. This be one of those  
> times. ;-)

I have test photographs the demonstrate the onset of diffraction at f/ 
6.3 to f/7.1 with the DA14mm lens. This is not diffraction limited,  
it's the point at which diffraction begins to intrude faster than the  
lens' resolution improves.

"Diffraction Limited" is a different thing ... A good enough  
explanation of the difference: "Diffraction is the ultimate limit to  
optical performance which cannot be overcome. Even if all aberrations  
were perfectly corrected there is still the diffraction which keeps  
the optics from reaching higher resolution. When using the term  
'diffraction limited' for a scientific instrument or a lens, it  
means: this optic is so good that it is limited by diffraction  
only." (Kornelius Fleischer, Photo.net, 9/3/99)

So aside from the nomenclature challenge, I empirically use the  
notion of approximately 2mm as my minimum lens opening for best lens  
performance at normal subject distances. It has never done me wrong.  
Sorry for the confusion.

Godfrey

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to