>> Apparently man can't adversely affect the environment. Didn't you know >> the recent rises in global temperature are all natural phenomenon? >> >There is something to be said for this theory as well. >Both sides of the debate have political motivations, >I don't trust either >side to be honest. >William Robb
Non-scientists have opinions all over the map, and many of them are politically motivated. Climatologists, that is scientists who have spent years learning the underlying science and more years studying the climate by actually going out and measuring things, and in general are not political, pretty much agree that mankind has contributed to global climactic change and that the change may become irreversable in the near future. What disagreement exists amoung climatologists is more to do with timing than anything else. So, people who don't know what they're talking about claim that the people who do know what they're talking about are mostly wrong. What does that tell you? Steve Farnham -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
