Certainly the FA35/2 is a very attractive lens, on many fronts. Its not as well built however, but then again how many lenses today are built like the old K's?
rg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Yes, I understand about the GB Kludge. I have, and am happy with, the > K35/2.0, however, the convenience and features of the A lens has led me to > ask the question. If the A isn't markedly superior to the K, then I'd not > be too interested in it, and would ultimately consider an FA35/2.0. > > Shel > > > > >>[Original Message] >>From: Gonz > > >>I dont know how it would compare with the K35, but with the K35 on the >>DSLR, you would have to use the green button, which is not a problem for >>me, might be for others. With the A35, you can set the aperture on the >>body and it does full time AE metering, no green button necessary. >> >>rg >> >> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>>How do the results compare with the K35/2.0 on the DSLR? Anyone know? > > > > -- Someone handed me a picture and said, "This is a picture of me when I was younger." Every picture of you is when you were younger. "...Here's a picture of me when I'm older." Where'd you get that camera man? - Mitch Hedberg -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
