huh? your not making any sense. If ebay did what you propose (buyer and seller have to agree for FB to be posted?), there wouldnt be anything but positives would there? and that would be useless. I said that feedback is intended is for the entire transaction and I stand by that. That doesnt mean the buyers and sellers will both agree on whether the transaction was good or bad. But what it means is I dont think its right to give a buyer postive feeback just because he paid because that is not the completion of the entire tranaction, thats only an early partial stage of the entire transaction.
jco -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Digital Image Studio Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 11:41 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: OT- eBay On 24/01/07, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What's your point in the context of my quote? I dont get it. You stated: "Feedback is for entire completed transactions, not just listings made or payments sent." This is plainly false, otherwise eBay would have implemented a mechanism whereby feedback couldn't be left independently by buyer and seller in any completed transaction. -- Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
